• Home
  • About Jonathan
  • Essay
  • Fiction
    • Rant
  • Memoir
  • A House Divided, Full of Secrets: Kid Lit., Conspiracies and the Bohemian Club

Ghosts of Anti-Fascism Past

~ Essays. Memoirs. Rants.

Ghosts of Anti-Fascism Past

Monthly Archives: November 2018

Correlations

Featured

Posted by Jonathan Mozzochi in Essay

≈ Leave a comment

My latest empirical research supports a strong correlation between good taste and high income levels. I just killed and ate a Facebook executive—he tasted delicious.

Share this:

  • Email
  • Twitter
  • More
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

No Wall, No Border

Featured

Posted by Jonathan Mozzochi in Essay

≈ Leave a comment

I wrote the following, last May, as part of a speculative fiction piece.

“June 1, 2018–The Summer of The Dancing Exodus

The Summer of 2018 begins with blistering heat waves and thousands of refugees forcibly reopening the land route through the Balkans and Greece; the restart of the migrant caravans on both sides of the U.S.-Mexico border; and, a deepening of militant memorials to the Nakba. With these signature developments the three great movements of people in the global south begin to coalesce.

June 5, 2018–Discourse

Slogans of ‘Family Reunification First’, ‘We Are All Refugees’, ‘On Demand Housing’ and ‘No More Work, So You Can Play’ begin to be shouted by wild-eyed subversives from makeshift pulpits.”

“Here, it seems, framing the right of movement in terms of fundamental human rights and survival begins to outstrip notions of charity, for which one is expected to be grateful, and access, which must be earned.”

“June 25, 2018–The Worm Turns

ICE raids in the U.S. begin to be met by unruly crowds of mothers and children. Street gangs begin targeting enforcement agents. An ICE picnic in a Texas park, replete with silhouettes of sprinting ‘illegals’ that participants shoot with paint guns, is demolished by protesters.

Thousands willfully obstruct ICE raids on meat packing plants in Illinois, Tennessee and Ohio, blocking armed raiders access to their targets.”

While my timeline may be a bit off, such fervid speculation has not been entirely off base.

From the New York Post November 25, 2018

“US Border Patrol agents fired tear gas to repel rock-throwing migrants who tried to storm through a border fence separating California and Mexico Sunday…”

The confrontation came after a caravan of several hundred Central American migrants — including women pushing kids in strollers — overwhelmed Mexican cops standing guard near the San Ysidro crossing that links San Diego with Tijuana, Mexico.

The group breezed by the blockade, carrying hand-painted Honduran and American flags and chanting, “We are not criminals! We are international workers!”

From the Washington Post

“Singing ‘Amazing Grace,’ a church surrounded an ICE van to stop an arrest. 27 were jailed.

And from a post on my webpage Mozzochi.wordpress.com from a few weeks ago:

“Border attacks need manse occupations. The next complimentary phase will be housing and rent protests–mass non violent direct action aimed at palatial estates, penthouses, resorts, yacht and golf clubs. Anywhere the elite live, reproduce and recreate.

Finally, from the NYT

“But Mr. Trump’s dystopian imagery has clearly left an impression with some. Carol Shields, 75, a Republican in northern Minnesota, said she was afraid that migrant gangs could take over people’s summer lake homes in the state.

“What’s to stop them?” said Ms. Shields, a retired accountant. “We have a lot of people who live on lakes in the summer and winter someplace else. When they come back in the spring, their house would be occupied.”

Oct. 22, 2018

My response, from the film Almost Mercy:

Exactly…

One day we will look upon these fortresses as so much concrete and steel that had to yield to the far more powerful force of human freedom. Walls are never a guarantor of freedom, but a singular impediment to that freedom.

Share this:

  • Email
  • Twitter
  • More
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Dear Max

Featured

Posted by Jonathan Mozzochi in Essay

≈ Leave a comment

Ok. You don’t like that picture. Sorry, but I do. That grin is from our kitchen sink, where I am bathing you, and we are both ecstatically happy. And I want more of those moments, together.

Please come home.

You are truly a force of nature. Your will is indomitable. You have proven, once again, that you will not be denied. Rather than endure another group meeting, you fled through a bathroom window, out into a hellscape with freezing temperatures and a massive toxic cloud of smoke from the Camp Fire–only a few miles north of you, with no money and a location you were totally unfamiliar with. After 24 hours on the run, I hope you have reached a safe haven.

Time to come home.

You have a wonderful character trait I lack: physical bravery. I am brave with my thoughts, in speech and writing, but a coward in body.

But you are so powerful and beautiful that sometimes we just hold you in awe. And that can be frightening, because that same unbounded courage can lead you to act without self regard. You hurt yourself. And we need to work on that–you and I–because I do that, too.

Time to get home.

You are loved. We miss you. Please come home. Your extended family is here for you.

Stay away from the shit. You know what I mean. Have your fun–you have earned it, in a peculiar sort of way. But go easy on your mind and body–chill, but don’t turn to the shit. If you have already, make the call. Right now.

I love your fierce loyalty and incipient anarchist contempt for authority (ask me what I mean by that later). But your loyalty to family and friends means listening to them. And all of your most important family is saying,

Get your ass home.

Make the call, soon. Or at least let me know you are ok, and we can negotiate a pick up.

We can add this to your roll call of shenanigans.

Another bed time story you can tell your children, when they are home with you, safe and warm.

I love you more than life itself.

Please come home.

Pops.

P.S. It’s Sunday, I won’t be working. I’ll be watching my version of the Super Bowl–match seven for a stake of the World Chess Championship. It will be a six hour thrill ride for me. But it could never compare to a call from you. Call me, come home.

Love you more.

Pops.

Share this:

  • Email
  • Twitter
  • More
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Mississippi Or Little Beirut?

14 Wednesday Nov 2018

Posted by Jonathan Mozzochi in Essay

≈ Leave a comment

Scot Nakagawa posted on Facebook a moving commemoration of the 30th anniversary of the racist murder of Mulugeta Seraw. And he was correct in highlighting the deep reservoir of racism that existed then and continues today. While I agree with his stated aim, I take issue with the term “Mississippi of the North” in his post.

I don’t recall Portland, Oregon ever being labeled as such–notwithstanding that the murder of Mulugeta Seraw alone could prove strong evidence that it has earned it. But something seems off with this designation. I did a quick search, and nothing. Perhaps you can find something I missed. But even if you find something in ‘the national media’, the phrase just doesn’t work. Boston or Chicago are far better suited for such a moniker. And there is the part about Portland being, well, west of Mississippi–way west of Mississippi, and somewhat North. And that Mississippi is a state, Portland a city.

Call me tone deaf, tactless, irascible or just get right to it–an asshole. I’m all that. But I’m also right. And, while it is undoubtedly true that in the world of politics one has to be ‘more than just right’, it also helps to be mindful of history and language. For instance, I have a long-standing aversion to the term ‘populism’, especially when it is used within a framework that equivocates all radical politics–extremism of the left and right are both the problem. Fuck that. From the left and below is the solution, not the problem. And that solution must extend beyond resistance to rebellion.

So part of the history of Oregon I uphold is that history of rebellion, reflected in another nickname for Portland, Oregon, ‘Little Beirut’.

Therefore I also stand with, and raise a toast to, the Portland, Oregon that is ‘Little Beirut’. If you don’t know what that nickname means, read this.

“Big Trouble In Little Beirut”, by John Locanthi, Willamette Week, May 4, 2016.

https://www.wweek.com/culture/2016/05/04/big-trouble-in-little-beirut/

And this from The Oregonian http://www.oregonlive.com/living/index.ssf/2016/04/little_beirut_legacy_20_of_the.html

It sucks to cite two print papers that got so much wrong back then, before and after the murder of Mulugeta, and I’m sure get so much wrong now. But I don’t have an alternative at hand. Both articles will give you a flavor of the protests and acts of militant anti-racism and resistance that preceded and followed the murder of Mulugeta Seraw.

I want that history–a history of militant resistance and rebellion–to be remembered and continued. Many of you on this thread (see Scot Nakagawa’s Facebook page) will remember because, like me, you were there.

And while it may be presumptuous of me to point this out a few days after the anniversary, I also believe that a dash of rebellion with our resistance is also a fitting tribute. Here’s to making the Mississippi of the West (if you must) Little Beirut (again).

END

Share this:

  • Email
  • Twitter
  • More
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Democratic Socialists of America and Black Liberation

14 Wednesday Nov 2018

Posted by Jonathan Mozzochi in Essay

≈ 4 Comments

“The Lesser Evil? The Left And The Democratic Party” New Left Review No. 155 January-February 1986.

I first read Mike Davis’ City Of Quartz: Excavating The Future In Los Angeles in 1990 when it was first published. While I was born in Los Angeles, I have never called it home. All the same, whenever I feel adrift politically, I can always regain my moorings through Mike Davis. Perhaps someone in Democratic Socialists of America, around the time Bernie Sanders was sandbagged on stage in Seattle by Black Lives Matter activists, could have benefitted from a close reading of the above. Perhaps someone still could.

“Although its significance was only vaguely grasped at the time, this increasing polarization between workerism and electoralism coincided with, and was immediately conditioned by, the decline of the Black liberation movement that had been the chief social motor of post-war radicalism. A dismaying, inverse law seemed to prevail between the collapse of grassroots mobilization in the ghettoes and the rise of the first wave of Black political patronage in the inner cities. While Black revolutionaries and nationalists were being decimated by J. Edgar Hoover’s cointelpro  programme of preemptive repression and infiltration, Black community organization was being reshaped into a passive clientelism manipulated by the human-services bureaucracy and the Democratic Party. Although the civil rights movement remained an unfinished revolution with an urgent agenda of economic and political demands, its centrality to the project of a popular American left was tragically, and irresponsibly, obscured in the late 1970s. The ranks of the white, ex-student left, preoccupied with academic outposts and intellectual celebrities, showed a profound inability to understand the strategic implications of the halting of the civil rights movement. For all the theoretical white smoke of the 1970s, including the endless debates on crisis theory and the nature of the state, the decisive problem of the fate of the Second Reconstruction was displaced beyond the field of vision. With minimal challenge or debate, leading journals like Socialist Review and Dissent tacitly demoted Black liberation—the critical democratic issue in American history—to the status of another progressive ‘interest’, coeval with sexual freedom or ecology.”

And,

“But it is unlikely that the transition towards the orbit of the Democratic Party could have occurred so rapidly without the intervention and coordination undertaken by the Harrington–Howe group, now reorganized as the Democratic Socialist Organizing Committee (dsoc). The charter concept of dsoc, according to a Harrington editorial written in the wake of the McGovern defeat, was the belief that ‘the left wing of realism is found today in the Democratic Party. It is there that the mass forces for social change are assembled; it is there that the possibility exists for creating a new first party in America.”

I think that’s what Bernie Sanders has been saying for almost fifty years. As the tide that carried the ‘blue ripple’ this past November 6, 2018 recedes, a critical challenge revolutionaries face is whether that project of a ‘party within a party’ is viable and can accomplish anything of lasting value. Certainly a failure to address the unfinished Second Reconstruction will guarantee its defeat.

END

Share this:

  • Email
  • Twitter
  • More
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Behind Every Great Fortune Lies A Crime Of Equal Proportion

05 Monday Nov 2018

Posted by Jonathan Mozzochi in Essay

≈ Leave a comment

They are murdering the future.

Share this:

  • Email
  • Twitter
  • More
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

GOT Und Uber Part One

04 Sunday Nov 2018

Posted by Jonathan Mozzochi in Essay

≈ Leave a comment

Audio Essay

got und uber 2018 part 1

The title highlights two developments with origins in the wreckage of the Great Recession. Game of Thrones and Uber prefigured the rise of Donald Trump. The touchstone cultural phenomenon of Game of Thrones explores new ways to express old ideas about blood and soil, power and authority, within a terrifying world that appears on the brink of collapse. GOT affirms the central role of nationalism in containing the threat of a world outside of capitalist market relations. Remember, it’s only the zombies who exist outside the ‘throne system’. And we are those zombies.

Uber, the corporate economic juggernaut is the tip of the spear of the Gig economy, always and everywhere a dissolving of the bonds of solidarity between workers and a rejection of whatever remains of a social contract represented by the so-called welfare state. Uber is making America move again, if only on a digital treadmill.

GOT

In approaching Game of Thrones it is useful to start at the beginning. Lest we forget, the opening scene is set at the base of the giant wall that is meant to keep out all those who refuse to accept the authority of the Throne System–most pointedly wildlings and the white walkers with their army of the dead. So there is, from the opening seconds, the wall and a zombie attack on the defenders of the wall. Together with the Throne System, this is all you need to understand in order to get caught up with the past seven years of the series. Nothing else matters.

The MacGuffin in GOT is not the throne, nor the ceaseless struggle between houses and realms for control of the throne, nor the ‘Revolution’ initiated by Denerys Stormborn and her dragons, nor the secret primeval magic hidden in the forest, nor the assassination fetishists in the money temple, nor the inter-generational conflict within houses. What moves the plot forward is the threat the dead pose to the power of the Throne System by breach of the wall. What I will argue is that we are the army of the dead; they are the overlords who rule principally because they have always ruled, by right of ancestry, family, blood, and thereby ‘race’. Don’t bother pointing out that GOT takes place in a fictional world of feudal relations–what’s important is that it recycles the ‘ancient prejudices’ of that era for modern tastes and serves as an allegory for the imperative of crushing everything outside of our modern throne system.

But what is the throne, other than the power to rule? It is control of the magic associated with blood, and bloodlines; it is the pseudoscience of ‘race’ projected forward in faux medieval terms in the only dramatic sense that has any power left: the zombie sub genre of horror.

This is why GOT should properly be classified as a blood and soil zombie soap opera that utilizes medieval fantasy conventions.

The creators of GOT know what the MacGuffin of their creation is: its resolution will come about through its diametric opposite: the super hero or the only collective action allowed by this structure, a fascist mobilization of humunculi.

GOT is a zombie series that utilizes medieval fantasy conventions. The immense popularity of the zombie horror genre is a reflection of fears about the people rebelling–when there was little chance of this, the fetid imagination of ‘a man and his castle’ could turn elsewhere–aliens, environmental apocalypse, plagues… But in a sense the fears of the ruling class always settle on zombies, because this fear represents the only real, and entirely possible, end of their world–the end of capitalism and capitalists that can only come about through a social revolution led by and composed of zombies. The only apocalypse that threatens elite rule is us; we are their end. “Everything I want is in the end of you”.

The explosion of super heroes throughout popular culture is the perfect analog to zombie fears: you know that the possibility of a mass uprising is increasing not least because the political hegemony that has been the basis for their rule is strained to the breaking point, and there is as yet no alternative in sight. But each and every infantile expression of this conundrum issued forth from the DC or Marvel ‘universe’ is a signal of weakness and anxiety, rather than a celebration of strength and assurance. It is also an expression of fears on the part of elites of an excess of democracy, of any form of collective action.

The film World War Z is the most complete and sophisticated contemporary expression of this current to date.

No surprise that the next project of the GOT creators is a fantasy where the Confederacy won the civil war, a riff on Birth Of A Nation. Fucking repugnant. More drenching in blood and race, war and nationalism. Look at the nexus of race and blood in GOT–an unleashing of reactionary themes in a war of all against all until the specter of the army of the dead appears. A thousand years in this soft porn of fascism is clearly the analog of thirty years to an amnesiac and presentist culture.

9:00

George Romero’s Night of the Living Dead.

Central take away is a racism so pathological it would rather be consumed by cannibals than saved by black people. Effective use of irony. Assault on the bourgeois family.

11:25

The zombies are us.

Allegory or parable of the Cold War. Threat of the masses.

World War Z

Shambling and running zombies.

Neo-liberalism. Liberal super hero in Brad Pitt.

The Wall. Zombies as the masses.

15:40

Twin totalitarian threats.

Camouflage is social democracy, liberalism. Genocide is the final solution.

20:00

Man In the High Castle–unwatchable train wreck on the question of what is fascism.

23:00

Drenched in blood; and there is no substance known to human beings that denotes ‘race’ quite like ‘blood’.

Blood and family 
Bloodlines
Blood for Blood
By right of birth and blood
Low born, high born

Rightful King by blood
Traitor‘s blood
Wildling blood in my veins
Lord of Light magic requires a King’s blood
There is power in a king’s blood
To defend my blood

Blood right to the throne
Blood ties

In season five, the opening scene has a witch taste a young Cersei’s blood to tell her future. 

Season 4, episode 6 “the laws of god and men.” A representative from the Iron Bank says, “across the narrow sea your books are filled with words like ‘usurper’ and ‘madman’ and ‘blood right’. Here our books are filled with numbers. We prefer the stories they tell.” 

This book, that book, they all work together. 

25:25

Soap operas are structured as a form of voyeurism wherein we watch the naval gazing of the ruling class and derive a guilty pleasure when they act badly. What’s important is that they act, we passively watch.

END

Share this:

  • Email
  • Twitter
  • More
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

‘Open’ vs ‘Closed’ Borders: A False Binary

03 Saturday Nov 2018

Posted by Jonathan Mozzochi in Essay

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

almost mercy, fascism, immigration, Mexico, Obama, Open source, Racism, refugees, socialism, troika, Trump

In the mutilated discourse called ‘immigration’ the false binary of the ‘open’ or ‘closed’ border is often posed absent any discussion of the colonial and imperialist wars that shape these vast movements of people. Whenever one speaks of attacking the legitimacy of fortress Europe, the United States’ militarized border with the global south or the complex of security barriers that isolate the state of Israel, one is immediately said to be in favor of ‘open borders’ and then the resultant chaos such a calamity would bring. I am opposed on principle to the way those borders structure and deform human life–creating categories such as ‘migrant’, ‘immigrant’, ‘refugee’, ‘asylum seeker’, ’emigrant’ and my favorite, with all its racist and colonial baggage, ‘expat’. But even when one takes the high road and insists on ‘asylum seeker’ rather than ‘migrant’ the trend of upholding this vast movement of people as the problem remains.

The ephemeral exigencies of American electoral politics play only a minor role in this. Obama deported–what is that number?– 2.5 million souls? We must explode this absurd binary of open and closed borders. The European Union does not represent ‘open borders’ but rather the Troika managed regulation of human labor and bio power which must meet the demands of capital–austerity and restricted movement for the many, flexible and brutally disciplined labor markets to prop up the few. When ‘borders’ are discussed as ‘facts’ that cannot be challenged, as ‘reality’ or a feature of the ‘national question’ which must be observed and accepted, lest one engage in ‘aspirational’ politics, or wishful thinking, the door to fascism gets propped ajar as it cannot be with a political program of socialist internationalism, rooted in solidarity. To effectively fight fascism we must attack the very foundations upon which borders are maintained. But not all borders, just those that are essential to neoliberalism and fascism alike. The anarchist slogan of no borders is correct, it just needs better focus.

The only way to break free from the straitjacket of ‘migration’ as an ‘issue’ and the endless racialized taxonomy that goes with it is to stand steadfast on the principle of internationalist solidarity. The perimeter and internal borders that structure our lives are essential to both neoliberal and fascist domination. Any analysis or discussion that begins by accepting as legitimate that which is illegitimate simultaneously upholds a right to regulate human labor and bio power through its endless categories of fully or lesser humans. This process turns our gaze from the juridical, material and political constructs of borders to the question of whether those intent on breaching those borders have a right to do so–whether they have a good reason to ask for asylum. But it matters not at all why people from the global South are moving north, only that that are moving north and that there are people helping them do so. At this historical juncture the most radical and far reaching act a revolutionary within the global north can take is to materially support that flow of humanity, not only because it is the right thing to do, not only because it is a good thing to do, but because it is the first necessary detonation of a 21st century socialist revolution–it is both a signal that it is underway as well as the concrete expression of the direct action needed to bring it about.

It will only be through the successive development of the Four Loci Of Attack (or something like it) and their expression as a concatenation of mutually reinforcing events that any one locus comes into being; that these agents of history become classes for themselves. Each social class cannot come into being separate from the other three.

Border attacks need manse occupations. The next complimentary phase will be housing and rent protests–mass non violent direct action aimed at palatial estates, penthouses, resorts, yacht and golf clubs. Anywhere the elite live, reproduce and recreate.

From the NYT

“But Mr. Trump’s dystopian imagery has clearly left an impression with some. Carol Shields, 75, a Republican in northern Minnesota, said she was afraid that migrant gangs could take over people’s summer lake homes in the state.

“What’s to stop them?” said Ms. Shields, a retired accountant. “We have a lot of people who live on lakes in the summer and winter someplace else. When they come back in the spring, their house would be occupied.”

Oct. 22, 2018

My response, from the film Almost Mercy:

Exactly…

One day we will look upon these fortresses as so much concrete and steel that had to yield to the far more powerful force of human freedom. Walls are never a guarantor of freedom, but a singular impediment to that freedom.

Share this:

  • Email
  • Twitter
  • More
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Gutmensch

01 Thursday Nov 2018

Posted by Jonathan Mozzochi in Essay, Rant

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

1968, AFD, Die Linke, economics, gutmensch, internationalism, Left wing, open borders, sarah wagenekcht, socialist

Audio Essay

gutmensch

00:00

Gutmensch–‘good human’ in German. Not to be confused with ‘good German’, a term for those banal enablers of classical Nazism who would later, after the fall of Nazism, suffer from bouts of selective amnesia. Gutmensch, since 1968, at least, has been rebranded as a snarky term of disdain by right wing lexicographers for the global uprisings of that year. The point was to taint left politics as politically correct, bleeding-heart, attitudinal kitsch, supported by do-gooder, hypocrites. I bring it up to reference the Die Linke split and the turn to the so-called ‘social national’ underway everywhere.

‘Open’ vs ‘closed’ borders is a false binary.

Gutmensch as a straw man argument.

6:20

Left and Right.

AFD and the ‘moralizing left’.

Split from Die Linke.

Sarah Wagenecht

Wolfgang Streeck

“The materialist left, not the moralist left.”

8:40

Fortress Europe is being defended by lapsed leftists who use the charge of ‘Gutmensch’ as a cudgel to beat the bourgeoisified left and revolutionary socialists alike.

9:30

Rich people are more likely to act generously toward the poor.?!?

10:20

‘Fairland’ just means lebensraum or heimat.

MARS Motor is engaged.

13:50

Aufstehen–‘Get Up’.

The Red-Brown Alliance from Hell.

15:46

Melanchon On “stealing the bread from French workers” and “no freedom of arrival”.

16:52

A Corrective

Socialist Internationalism and Solidarity.

Our political philosophy is grounded in something quite different from such ideas. Socialist internationalism and the principle of solidarity that informs it is not a bleeding heart moralistic melodrama, it is a pillar of our ethics and a central strategic doctrine, a principle necessary for the success of our struggle that is also first in order of battle.

Socialist internationalism is the inviolable, essential principle that workers within states have more in common with workers in other states than with any national interest. They are linked together in a common struggle that overrides any national interest, especially as articulated by their national elites. This principle is most important in the core of capitalism, where fascism lives. We call it solidarity. It is inseparable from our larger identity, its importance so sacred that its violation is universally recognized as the most important failure of the left that led to World War I, its further debasement a central factor in the beginning of World War II, its importance today a bulwark against the spread of fascism.

This principle of solidarity is inviolable–never to be broken, infringed upon or dishonored.

If socialist internationalism was a religion, we could say to break this would be a heresy; its abridgment that which makes possible our evil doppelgänger in ‘national socialism’, which is where violating that principle leads. In the core countries within which fascism organizes, the abandonment of this principle can only result in the still-birth of the revolutionary movement and the opening of the door to fascism.

Solidarity is non negotiable–it shall not be bought, sold, exchanged or transferred.

Solidarity is fundamental to our revolutionary strategy.

It is a central doctrine.

When even ravers battle fascists on the streets, Michael Hardt is organizing a ship to rescue refugees in the Mediterranean, Portland, Oregon antifascists blockade ICE facilities, another caravan has departed from harsh environs to breach the northern wall and Philadelphia activists have established ‘resistance zones’; while all this is underway, the lapsed leftists of Aufagwegnacht want to debate the ‘social national’ by outflanking the AFD on pensions for workers who have lived in country for 35 years. That’s not a ‘class based proposal’ nor a turn to the ‘social’, that’s a national socialist proposal. To engage with it is to accept it as an argument, rather than an assault.

The principle of solidarity is not only essential, but first.

The Four Loci of Attack upend Marxist categories, but uphold them as well. The workers struggle is essential, but not the only struggle and rather than first, it is third in the order of battle. The other loci must shape the workers struggle, and channel it towards liberation.

This turn to the ‘social national’ is not only a failure of solidarity, but a strategic failure, too. In other words, it is a ‘moral’ failure, but worse, it concedes to neoliberals and fascists alike terrain that if given up fatally compromises the socialist revolution. That’s a strategic failure, not only a moral one, not only a violation of principle, but a departure from good politics. When you violate this principle, you abandon the revolution.

The turn to the social national is a violation of principle and therefore our ethics, our creed and above all strategy. This failure to theorize a way out of this false binary too often results in a conception of ‘the national’ not so much as a terrain of conflict that we contest but as the only terrain to contest anything. From this position comes the obliteration of the first necessary spark of a 21st century international revolution: The borders of the capitalist core.

To argue otherwise is to begin a discourse with fascism within a deranged framework of ‘immigration realism’ which is really nothing other than ‘race realism’ practiced by lapsed leftists. This is the sickening nonsense of the so-called moderate center of American politics that animates practically all discussion of borders: that this or that border is necessary and how to regulate the flow the only ‘issue’. Within this framework anti immigrant activism is ‘xenophobia’, an irrational fear of an other, rather than first and foremost institutional racism; Islamophobia is ‘religious bigotry’ rather than first and foremost an expression of racism leavened with Christian triumphalism imbedded within the very concept of the American nation.

Socialist solidarity is a principle held in perpetuity. What’s that mean? Forever.

END

Share this:

  • Email
  • Twitter
  • More
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Subscribe

  • Entries (RSS)
  • Comments (RSS)

Archives

  • February 2023
  • December 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • May 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • November 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • June 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • October 2017
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • November 2014
  • July 2014
  • December 2013
  • October 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013

Categories

  • Book Review
  • Essay
  • Fiction
  • Memoir
  • Movie Review
  • Podcast Review
  • Portland Anti-Fascist Archives Project
  • Rant
  • Snippets

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in

Blogroll

  • Discuss
  • Get Inspired
  • Get Polling
  • Get Support
  • Institute for Research and Education on Human Rights
  • Learn WordPress.com
  • Theme Showcase
  • WordPress Planet
  • WordPress.com News

Blogs I Follow

  • Rain Coast Review
  • birchsays
  • BRAINCHILD
  • In Dianes Kitchen
  • Being Zab
  • chrislondon.org
  • Hannes van Eeden
  • The Decolonial Atlas
  • Site Title
  • HARD CRACKERS
  • R.J. Slater
  • ∞
  • LOWLIFE MAGAZINE
  • Work With Lapo
  • rajchandran2013
  • Table 41: A Novel by Joseph Suglia
  • Mark Bray
  • Selected Squibs, Scrips, and Essays by Joseph Suglia
  • GABFRAB
  • Democracy & Good Governance

Blogroll

  • Discuss
  • Get Inspired
  • Get Polling
  • Get Support
  • Institute for Research and Education on Human Rights
  • Learn WordPress.com
  • Theme Showcase
  • WordPress Planet
  • WordPress.com News

Blog at WordPress.com.

Rain Coast Review

Thoughts on life... by Donald B. Wilson

birchsays

BRAINCHILD

gehadsjourney.wordpress.com

In Dianes Kitchen

Recipes showing step by step directions with pictures and a printable recipe card.

Being Zab

The Storyteller (Qissa-Go)

chrislondon.org

Hannes van Eeden

The Decolonial Atlas

Site Title

HARD CRACKERS

Chronicles of Everyday Life

R.J. Slater

educator, writer, photographer

∞

LOWLIFE MAGAZINE

"Find what you love and let it kill you." – Charles Bukowski

Work With Lapo

rajchandran2013

4 out of 5 dentists recommend this WordPress.com site

Table 41: A Novel by Joseph Suglia

Mark Bray

Historian. Organizer. Writer.

Selected Squibs, Scrips, and Essays by Joseph Suglia

The Web log of Dr. Joseph Suglia

GABFRAB

Democracy & Good Governance

Blogging on the new "Caring Economics" that takes into account the full spectrum of economic activities–from the life–sustaining activities of the household, to the life-enriching activities of caregivers and communities, to the life-supporting processes of nature.

  • Follow Following
    • Ghosts of Anti-Fascism Past
    • Join 35 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Ghosts of Anti-Fascism Past
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: